Event: Social Ties in Animal Politics

Mutuality Beyond Humanity

Mutuality Beyond Humanity

,

Professor Alasdair Cochrane

Co-Investigator


Alasdair Cochrane is Professor of Political Theory. His research focuses on ‘animal politics’ which asks how our political institutions, values and structures affect the lives of animals, and how they might be transformed for the benefit of all. He has written many articles, chapters and books on this theme, including: Animal Rights without Liberation (Columbia, 2012); Sentientist Politics (Oxford, 2018); and Should Animals Have Political Rights? (Polity, 2020). He is looking forward to extending this exploration of whether social cooperation with animals is possible, and what it might look like, in Multispecies Mutualisms.

For more information about their research, please visit the Alasdair’s full academic profile.

Date: September 8, 2026 – September 9, 2026
Location: The Wave, Sheffield, United Kingdom

A close-up of a shallow metal bird bath mounted on a terracotta pedestal. Three small bird ornaments sit around the rim, with one in the foreground holding its wings open. The background is softly blurred with hints of flowers and greenery.
Decorative birds on a birdbath (photo by Lucy Dunning)

Social and political relationships constitute the foundation of our shared communities. Yet, scholars working in the field of animal politics have not had these social ties as their primary focus. They have predominately highlighted the systematic injustice and exploitation that blight many of our relationships with nonhuman animals. This body of work has argued extensively for the rights of animals to fair treatment and political representation.

Although crucial, a focus on injustice leaves out the question of whether the numerous relational concepts traditionally reserved for human society — such as civic friendship, trust, and solidarity — can be meaningfully extended to nonhuman animals. The project of identifying and theorising injustice continues to be important, but a positive vision of what a just interspecies community would look like necessitates engagement with social ties. To reimagine and build a multispecies political community that works for us all, we must begin exploring the actual, lived quality of the social and political relationships that bind humans and animals together, or set us apart.

To that end, this conference seeks to investigate the everyday reality of coexistence with animals by exploring the diverse range of social, political, and institutional relationships between us. By thinking about the limits and potential of existing interspecies encounters, we hope to unearth the conceptual and critical resources needed to rethink our shared social and political life with animals.

Doing so requires us to engage with the idea that we are co-participants who share in social ties with nonhuman others. But there are profound challenges to any possible vision of mutuality beyond humanity. For example, can the inescapable asymmetries in power, or the significant communicative and epistemic barriers between species, be overcome to realise a genuine interspecies politics?

In what ways do human-animal social relationships contribute to a flourishing political community? How do these relationships serve individual and collective interests in health, happiness, and community?

Can positive relational concepts like civic friendship or co-citizenship be meaningfully extended to non-human animals? Are interspecies relations of trust, civility, and tolerance possible?

How, if at all, should negative relational concepts like aggression, incivility, or contempt be applied to animals? If animals can be our companions and our friends, can they also be our enemies?

Is interspecies solidarity possible? Can humans and animals have mutual goodwill towards one another? Can we have alliances with animals?

Why might mutuality with domesticated animals differ from with wild animals? Should we pursue relationships with wild animals, or is mutuality undesirable? On what terms might it be acceptable?

Can humans and animals engage in mutually creative and cultural relationships? Can humans and animals play, learn and co-create?

Are relations of mutuality possible if there are profound asymmetries in power and cognitive ability between humans and animals? Can farmers, for example, be friends with those animals that they exploit? Can humans be friends with mice?

How do the concepts of love and care challenge or complicate traditional ways of thinking about justice for animals?

How should ethical theory account for the inherent dangers and exploitation present in many human-animal relationships, even those defined by intimacy? Can animals be exploited? Do animals have an interest in noninferiority?

How might emerging technologies facilitate, improve or harm relationships with animals? How, if at all, should AI be used to transform relationships with animals? How might animals need protection from these developments?

This is the latest in a series of longstanding annual ‘Animal Politics’ conferences. Details on past events (since 2010) can be found here: https://josh-milburn.com/animal-politics/

Multispecies Mutualism Coinvestigator Alasdair Cochrane is organising the conference, along with: Steve Cooke (University of Leicester); Sara van Goozen (University of York); Josh Milburn (Loughborough University); Angie Pepper (Roehampton University); Matt Perry (University of Sheffield).

There are no fees to attend, but please register by emailing Matt Perry on m.w.perry@sheffield.ac.uk by Friday 21 August. When registering, please mention any dietary or accessibility requirements.

Refreshments and a buffet lunch will be provided, funded by a Mind Association Conference Grant and the Multispecies Mutualisms project

We are committed to making the event welcoming for everyone by adhering to the BPA/SWiP Guidelines for Accessible Conferences and the BPA/SWiP Good Practice Scheme. For more information, please get in touch with the organisers.